The Prosecutor of the Crimea showed evidence of subversive activity of the Mejlis
The Prosecutor of the Crimea Natalia Polonskaya presented in the Supreme court of the Republic proof of extremist and subversive activities of the unrecognized Crimean Tatar Mejlis. This was reported on Thursday, March 3, the «Criminals».
The head of the Supervisory authority told exactly which episodes indicate illegal activities of the organization’s leaders, in particular, that «their (leaders — approx. «The tape.ru») involvement in the riots at the state border in may 2014 and subversive activities in November 2015″.
The defendant in the person of Deputy Chairman of Majlis Nariman Jelal and his lawyer Cemil Temicheva made a motion to give them time to familiarize with submitted to the court materials. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for March 10.
15 February Poklonskaya sent to the Supreme court of Republic the claim to ban the activities of Mejlis. In his address the head of the Supervisory authority were guided by the Federal law «On counteracting extremist activities».
In January the Prosecutor of the Crimea informed that the Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Mustafa Dzhemilev and leader of the unrecognized Crimean Tatar Mejlis Refat Chubarov announced on the international wanted list, and the coordinator of the so-called civil embargo of Crimea Lenur islyamov — in Federal.
Dzhemilev, islyamov and Chubarov in September 2015 started a food blockade of the Crimea. Together with the militants of banned in Russia group «the Right sector» (PS) they blocked the entry of trucks with Ukrainian goods on the territory of the Republic. In addition, representatives of the Crimean Tatar Mejlis and PS did not allow repair crews to emergency supports power lines in the Kherson region after the end of November after the detonation structures was disrupted power supply of the Peninsula from Ukraine.
Crimea became part of Russia in March 2014 on the results of the referendum in which the overwhelming majority of the population participated in the voting, voted for this decision. Kiev refused to recognize the results of the referendum. In Moscow, in turn, say that the procedure for annexation of Crimea consistent with international law.